Inverted Red-Edge Chlorophyll Index: The Inverted Red-Edge Chlorophyll Index algorithm incorporates the reflectance in four bands to estimate canopy chlorophyll content (Guyot and Baret 1988 Clevers et al. 2000). The 'red edge' is the name given to the abrupt reflectance change in the 680-740 nm region of vegetation spectra that is caused by the combined effects of strong chlorophyll absorption and leaf internal scattering. Increases in the amount of chlorophyll visible to the sensor either through an increase in leaf chlorophyll content or Leaf Area Index (LAI) result in a broadening of a major chlorophyll absorption feature centred around 680 nm. The effect is to cause a movement of the point of maximum slope termed the red edge position (REP). The position of the red edge has been used as an indicator of stress and senescence of vegetation (Collins1978 Horler et al. 1983 Rock et al. 1988 Boochs et al. 1990 Jago and Curran 1995). The IRECI results from the following (Sensor-dependent) equation: IRECI = (IR_factor * near_IR - red1_factor * red1) / (red2_factor * red2 / red3_factor * red3). For Sentinel-2 the formula is: (B7 - B4) / (B5 / B6) where (Central wavelength/Bandwidth): B7 = 783 nm (15 nm) B6 = 740 nm (15 nm) B5 = 705 nm (15 nm) B4 = 665 nm (30 nm)

Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index: This index takes advantage of the different scattering responses from the blue and red band to retrieve information regarding the atmosphere opacity. The Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index algorithm was introduced by Kaufman and Tanre (1992). The resistance of the ARVI to atmospheric effects (in comparison to the NDVI) is accomplished by a self-correction process for the atmospheric effect on the red channel. This is done using the difference in the radiance between the blue and the red channels to correct the radiance in the red channel. Compared to the red band the blue band is much more easily scattered by the atmosphere particles. This explains why the sky is usually perceived as being blue. Thus the ARVI index takes advantage of the different scattering responses from the blue and red band to retrieve information regarding the atmosphere opacity. Simulations using radiative transfer computations on arithmetic and natural surface spectra for various atmospheric conditions show that ARVI has a similar dynamic range to the NDVI but is on average four times less sensitive to atmospheric effects than the NDVI. The ARVI results from the following equation:ARVI = (IR_factor * near_IR - rb) / (IR_factor * near_IR + rb) where: rb = (red_factor * red) - gamma * (blue_factor * blue - red_factor * red) with gamma = 1. The main reason why the blue band is more susceptible to atmospheric scattering than the red band is because its wavelength is shorter. Generally the shorter wavelength has stronger scattering. It's very similar to the way sea waves behave over oceans. When a large wave strikes an object such as a ferryboat it is more capable of continuing on its path by going around the object. On the other hand it is dispersed more easily when the waves are smaller in size. Consequently by obtaining the difference between the reflectance of the highly sensitive blue band and the less sensitive red band (blue - red) it serves like an indicator of what the atmospheric conditions were like. Here gamma serves as a weighting function for the difference reflectance of the two bands. Various values can be chosen for it which mainly depends on the type of aerosol size. According to Kaufaman and Tanre's statement in 1992 it is best to select a gamma value of 1 when information on the aerosol type is not available. Consequently the main purpose of the above rb equation is to decrease the influence brought forth from the atmosphere where a more accurate assessment of the value of the red reflectance can be obtained.

The Transformed Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (TSAVI) method is a vegetation index that minimizes soil brightness influences by assuming the soil line has an arbitrary slope and intercept. TSAVI = (s *(NIR - s * Red - a)) / (a * NIR + Red - a * s + X * (1 + s2))

The Normalized Difference Water Index algorithm was developed by Gao (19964) being a measure of liquid water molecules in vegetation canopies that interacted with the incoming solar radiation. NDWI is sensitive to changes in liquid water content of vegetation canopies. It is less sensitive to atmospheric effects than NDVI. NDWI does not remove completely the background soil reflectance effects therefore it should be considered as an independent vegetation index. It is complementary to not a substitute for NDVI. The NDWI results from the following equation: NDWI = (IR_factor * near_IR - mir_factor * middle_IR) / (IR_factor * near_IR + mir_factor * middle_IR)

The Transformed Normalized Difference Vegetation Index algorithm indicates a relation between the amount of green biomass that is found in a pixel. (Senseman et.al. 1996). Transformed Normalised Difference Vegetation index (TNDVI) is the square root of the NDVI. It has higher coefficient of determination for the same variable and this is the difference between TNDVI and NDVI. The formula of TNDVI has always positive values and the variances of the ratio are proportional to mean values. The TNDVI results from the following equation: TNDVI = sqrt( (IR_factor * near_IR - red_factor * red) / (IR_factor * near_IR + red_factor * red) + 0.5)

The Normalized Difference Pond Index algorithm was developed by J.P Lacaux et al. (2006).The NDPI makes it possible not only to distinguish small ponds and water bodies (down to 0.01 ha) but also to differentiate vegetation inside ponds from that in their surroundings The NDPI results from the following equation: NDPI = (mir_factor * middle_IR - green_factor * green) / (mir_factor * middle_IR + green_factor * green)

The Normalised Difference Turbidity Index (NDTI) quantifies the difference in reflectance between specific spectral bands which correlates with suspended sediment and turbidity levels.

The Transformed Normalized Difference Vegetation Index algorithm indicates a relation between the amount of green biomass that is found in a pixel. (Senseman et.al. 1996). Transformed Normalised Difference Vegetation index (TNDVI) is the square root of the NDVI. It has higher coefficient of determination for the same variable and this is the difference between TNDVI and NDVI. The formula of TNDVI has always positive values and the variances of the ratio are proportional to mean values. The TNDVI results from the following equation: TNDVI = sqrt( (IR_factor * near_IR - red_factor * red) / (IR_factor * near_IR + red_factor * red) + 0.5)

The Modified Normalized Difference Water Index algorithm was developed by Xu 2006 and can enhance open water features while efficiently suppressing and even removing built-up land noise as well as vegetation and soil noise. The greater enhancement of water in the MNDWI-image will result in more accurate extraction of open water features as the built-up land soil and vegetation all negative values and thus are notably suppressed and even removed. The MNDWI results from the following equation: MNDWI = (green_factor * green - mir_factor * middle_IR) / (green_factor * green + mir_factor * middle_IR)

The Weighted Difference Vegetation Index algorithm was introduced by Clevers (1988). This has a relationship to PVI similar to the relationship IPVI has to NDVI. WDVI is a mathematically simpler version of PVI but it has an unrestricted range.Like PVI WDVI is very sensitive to atmospheric variations (Qi et al. 1994). The WDVI results from the following equation: WDVI = (IR_factor * near_IR - g * red_factor * red) where: g is the slope of the soil line.